Analysis & Evaluation of Participant Test Results

Common Ancestor Group 1

Lineage of #34885
Marvin Henry Stout (1906-1992) & Clara Frances Gaines (1913-1993) >> John Daniel Stout Sr. (1883-1927) & Martha Dell Epperson (1886-1967) >> Rev. Daniel Thomas Stout (1846-1915) & Sarah Elizabeth Stogner (1846-1937) >> George W. Stout b. abt 1818 in Tennessee, d. ?, he md. Elizabeth Breedlove on 11 Feb 1844 in Noxubee County, MS, she was b. 28 Mar 1829 in Alabama and d. ?.

Lineage of #122661

Raymond Louis Stout (1925-1995) & Living >> Oscar Stout (1890-1927) & Vivian Thyra Lyons (1903-2005) >> Willis Washington Stout (1861-1912) & Dora Annie Prudhomme (1863-1908) >> Florentin Napoleon Stout b. 17 Mar 1830 in Louisiana, d. 27 Apr 1890 in Lake Charles, Calcasieu, LA, he md. Mary Nathalie Carron on 7 Oct 1856 in Saint Landry Parish, LA, she was b. abt 1834 in Louisiana, d. 1895.

Common Ancestor Group 2

Lineage of #34209
Melvin James Stout (1906-1987) & Georgia Estelle Fitch (1918-1998) >> Albert William Stout (1874-1944) & Frances Gertrude Eckles (1874-1948) >> James Madison Stout (1849-1927) & Alice Elizabeth Swires (1844-1898) >> James M. Stout b. 14 Nov 1799 in Kentucky, d. 17 Jun 1863 in Mifflin, WI, he md. Mary Ann Craig on 27 Jan 1833 in Lincoln County, MO, she was b. 13 Jan 1816 in Hamilton County, OH and d. 23 Jan 1903 in Rock Rapids, IA.

Lineage of #42124
William Marion Stout (1898-1971) & Lulu Myrtle Davison (1908-1979) >> Marion William Stout (1855-1923) & Anna Meiers (1872-1967) >> William Drake Stout (1811-1893) & Abby Simonds (1823-1858) >> John Stout (1775-1841) & Pamelia Drake (1781-1855) >> Abraham Stout (1735-1777) & Alice Houghton (1737-1775) >> John Stout (1713-1790) & Rachel Merrill (1715-1795) >> James Stout (1694-1727) & Catherine Simpson (1692-1749) >> David Stout (1667-1732) & Rebecca Ashton (1672-1725) >> Richard Stout b. abt 1615 in Burton Joyce, England, d. 1705 in Middletown, Monmouth County, NJ, he md. Penelope Van Princis abt 1644.

Lineage of #53790
Columbus E. Stout (1890-?) & Edna Lorena Fagan (1893-1961) >> Robert C. Stout (1862-aft 1930) & Mary E. Cary (1869- ?) >> Robert Leonard Stout (1830-aft 1880) & Miriam Wassom (1832-bef 1870) >> Zachariah Stout (1786-bet 1850/1860) & Sarah Veach (1787-aft 1870) >> Peter Stout (1763-1831) & Eleanor Leonard (?-?) >> Samuel Stout (1740-1816) & Rachel Chauncey (1741-?) >> Peter “The Quaker” Stout (1715-1802) & Margaret Cypert (1716-?) >> Samuel Stout (1676-1733) & Margaret Price (1678-1730) >> Peter Stout (1654-1704) & Mary Bollen (1655-1692) >> Richard Stout b. abt 1615 in Burton Joyce, England, d. 1705 in Middletown, Monmouth County, NJ, he md. Penelope Van Princis abt 1644.

Lineage of #59523
Anvil Gordon Stout (1899-1962) & Ruth Evelyn Young (1903-1983) >> William Ephriam Stout (1860-1939) & Frances Elizabeth Wiggins (1857-1926) >> William P. Stout (1839-1866) & Emaline Thomason (1842-aft 1870) >> Ephraim Stout (1807-1865) & Celia [--?--] (1810-1852) >> Jacob Stout (1782-1870) & Sarah Long (1785-1835) >> Samuel Stout (1740-1816) & Rachel Chauncey (1741-?) >> Peter “The Quaker” Stout (1715-1802) & Margaret Cypert (1716-?) >> Samuel Stout (1676-1733) & Margaret Price (1678-1730) >> Peter Stout (1654-1704) & Mary Bollen (1655-1692) >>Richard Stout b. abt 1615 in Burton Joyce, England, d. 1705 in Middletown, Monmouth County, NJ, he md. Penelope Van Princis abt 1644.

Lineage of #101252
Robert Sidney Stout (1931-1993) & [Living] >> Carter Weakly Stout (1892-1943) & Mildred McRae (1897-1982) >> Robert Wines Stout (1865-1942) & Amanda Emmaline Johnson (1864-1950) >> Andrew Wilson Stout (1837-1894) & Louisa Higgins (1841-1865) >> Alexander Hill Stout (1909-1888) & Jane Whitset (1820-1864) >> Robert K. Stout b. 13 Oct 1772, d. 29 Sep 1835, he md. Nancy Kyle on 10 Jan 1799, she was b. 8 Feb 1781, d. 15 Feb 1862.

Lineage of #122067
Elston Henry Stout (1909-2000) & [Living] >> Stanford Newton Stout (1861-1938) & Amanda Jane Potts (1868-1951) >> Charles Wesley Stout (1828-1904) & Catharine M. Fangboner (1831-1911) >> Jacob Stout (1801-1880) & Margaret McIlroy (1793-1871) [Participant considers lineage beyond this generation not proven] >> David Stout (1778-?) & Unknown Robins (?-?) >> Jacob Stout (1738-1808) & Deborah Huff (?-?) >> Joseph Stout (1698-1770) & Martha Reeder (?-?) >> David Stout (1667-1732) & Rebecca Ashton (1672-1725) >> Richard Stout b. abt 1615 in Burton Joyce, England, d. 1705 in Middletown, Monmouth County, NJ, he md. Penelope Van Princis abt 1644.

Lineage of #138610
Noble Warren Stout (1920-2000) & [Living] >> James Alfred Stout (Alfred James Stout) (1882-1960) & Charity Adaline James (?-?) >> Marcus Fletcher Stout b. 15 Apr, 1860 in Mississippi, d. 7 Dec 1937 in Scott Township, Sharp County, AR, he md. Martha E. Brewster on 20 Dec 1881 in Sharp County, AR, she was b. 12 Sep 1863 in Arkansas and d. 18 Nov 1944 in Lawrence County, AR.

Lineage of #153375
Milton Russell Stout (1925-1993) & [Living] >> William Thomas Stout (1891-1960) & Ida Lucreta Roundtree (1900-1982) >> Sidney Lee Stout (1867-1946) & Matilda Emaline Fraser (1869-1960) >> William Stout (1845-1899) & Margaret Susannah Brown (1848-1888) >> George W. Stout (abt 1823- bef 1870) & Charlotte Pharris (abt 1823-1888).

Lineage of #159058
Fletcher Foch Stout (1918-1977) & Zeola Tinch (1922-1988) >> Ridley Stout (1896-1966) & Kellie Ann Cantrell (1896-1952) >> Thomas Fletcher Bates Stout (1856-1929) & Judah Ann Cantrell (1858-1927) >> Isaac Marion Stout (1834-1908) & Winnie Ledbetter (1835-1892) >> William Stout (1798-1865) & Mary (Polly) Ann Bowman (1794-1882) >> Samuel Stout (1771-1839) & Leah Sidwell (1773-?) >> Samuel Stout (1740-1816) & Rachel Chauncey (1741-?) >> Peter “The Quaker” Stout (1715-1802) & Margaret Cypert (1716-1799) >> Samuel Stout (1676-1733) & Margaret Price (1678-1730) >> Peter Stout (1654-1704) & Mary Bollen (1655-1692) >> Richard Stout b. abt 1615 in Burton Joyce, England, d. 1705 in Middletown, Monmouth County, NJ, he md. Penelope Van Princis abt 1644.

Lineage of #170405
Elmer Ray Stout (1916-1984) & Charleen G. Rasnic (?-1998) >>George Marion Stout (1878-1959) & Anna Mae White (1883-1922) >> Jesse Barnett Stout (1828-1886) & Susan Jane Lewis (1845-1919) >> James Alexander Stout was born Bet. 1790-1800 in Sumner County, TN, and died Bet. 1849-1850 in Jersey or Green County, IL. He md. Serene Roundtree on 23 Oct 1827 in Madison County, IL, she was born Nov 1811 in Kentucky, and d. 23 Sep 1850 in Jersey or Green County, IL.

Lineage of #182105
Louis Garrett Stout (1924-1987) & Beverly Jean Wright (1929-1997) >> Harve Dero Stout (1883-1931) & Laura Texas Kirby (1883-1974) >> George W. Stout (1846-1914) & Mary Elizabeth Wilson (1848-1897) >> William M. Stout b. 15 Aug 1824 d. 2 Apr 1891, he md. Jane Meadows abt 1843/44, she was b. 3 Feb 1828 and d. 19 Mar 1896.

Lineage of #184042
William Fowler Stout (1913-2005) & Winne Deane Wheat (1914-1969) >>Cass Selwin Stout (1884-1953) & Etta Agnes Eldridge (1866-1971) >> Thomas Fletcher Bates Stout (1856-1929) & Judah Ann Cantrell (1858-1927) >>Isaac Marion Stout (1834-1908) & Winnie Ledbetter (1835-1892) >> William Stout (1798-1865) & Mary (Polly) Ann Bowman (1794-1882) >> Samuel Stout (1771-1839) & Leah Sidwell (1773-?) >> Samuel Stout (1740-1816) & Rachel Chauncey (1741-?) >> Peter “The Quaker” Stout (1715-1802) & Margaret Cypert (1716-1799) >> Samuel Stout (1676-1733) & Margaret Price (1678-1730) >> Peter Stout (1654-1704) & Mary Bollen (1655-1692) >> Richard Stout b. abt 1615 in Burton Joyce, England, d. 1705 in Middletown, Monmouth County, NJ, he md. Penelope Van Princis abt 1644.

Lineage of #196189
Ernest Leon Stout (1908-2002) & [Living] >> James Alexander Stout (1878-1964) & Nora Belle LeMaster (?-?) >> Thomas Benton Stout (1850-1925) & Mary Jane Kelsey (?-?) >> John L. Stout (1819-1861) & Celia Amanda Carroll (?-?) >> Judiah Stout (1799-1871) & Delilah Cook/Cooke (?-?) >> Elijah Stout (1761-1838) & Anna Stout (?-?) >> James Stout (?-?) & Rachel Higgins (?-?) >> Freegift Stout (1693-1769) & Mary Higgins (?-?) >> David Stout (1667-1732) & Rebecca Ashton (1672-1725-) >> Richard Stout b. abt 1615 in Burton Joyce, England, d. 1705 in Middletown, Monmouth County, NJ, he md. Penelope Van Princis abt 1644.

Lineage of #211169
Malcolm R. Stout (1910-1975) & Dorothy Lee West (1914-1991) >> James S. Stout (1885-1959) & Tennessee Dunham (1890-1980) >> Robert James Stout (1850-1911) & Elizabeth Manier (1854-1908) >> George Washington Stout (1824-bef 1870) & Charlotte Pharis (abt 1824-1888) >> Samuel Stout (abt 1804-?) & Eleanor Stout (abt 1800-1884) >> Samuel Stout (1771-1839) & Leah Sidwell (1773-?) >> Samuel Stout (1740-1816) & Rachel Chauncey (1741-?) >> Peter “The Quaker” Stout (1715-1802) & Margaret Cypert (1716-1799) >> Samuel Stout (1676-1733) & Margaret Price (1678-1730) >> Peter Stout (1654-1704) & Mary Bollen (1655-1692) >> Richard Stout b. abt 1615 in Burton Joyce, England, d. 1705 in Middletown, Monmouth County, NJ, he md. Penelope Van Princis abt 1644.

Lineage of #211224
Buster Stout (1923-1982) & Willo Brooke Smith (1924-1995) >> Ridley Stout (1896-1966) & Kellie Ann Cantrell (1896-1952) >> Thomas Fletcher Bates Stout (1856-1929) & Judah Ann Cantrell (1858-1927)>> Isaac Marion Stout (1834-1908) & Winnie Ledbetter (1835-1892) >> William Stout (1798-1865) & Mary (Polly) Ann Bowman (1794-1882) >> Samuel Stout (1771-1839) & Leah Sidwell (1773-?) >> Samuel Stout (1740-1816) & Rachel Chauncey (1741-?) >> Peter “The Quaker” Stout (1715-1802) & Margaret Cypert (1716-1799) >> Samuel Stout (1676-1733) & Margaret Price (1678-1730) >> Peter Stout (1654-1704) & Mary Bollen (1655-1692) >> Richard Stout b. abt 1615 in Burton Joyce, England, d. 1705 in Middletown, Monmouth County, NJ, he md. Penelope Van Princis abt 1644.

Lineage of #220588
James Smith Stout b. 1819 in New Jersey, d. 1912 in Ohio.

Lineage of #251050
Mark Reginald Stout (1925-2007) & [Living] >> John Thomas Stout (1904-1953) & Ethel Johnson (1904-?) >> Mark Stout (1868-1923) & Emma Ann or Ada (Elliott) Archer (1877-?) >> Thomas (abt 1822-1888) &  Ann  Mellors (?-1911) >> John Stout (abt 1782-1865) & Martha Hackitt (1787-1867) >> John Stout (?-1834) & Anne Hunter (?-1829) >> Thomas Stout (abt 1715-1762/63) & Elizabeth Webster (abt 1719-1810/11) >> John Stout (abt 1684-1740) & Anne Grammar (1684/85-1746) >> Charles Stout (1650-1715) & Ann Benet (1664-1688) >> Francis  Stout (1609-1651) & Jane Wightman (1613-1658) >> John Stout b. abt 1586 in England, d. 1653 in England, he md. Margaret Jebbe 22 Nov 1607 in Gedling, England, she was b. ? in England, d. 7 Feb 1638 in England.

Research Note: Participants in this Group have a predicted Haplogroup of R1b1a2. According to Family Tree DNA, “…R1b1 is the most common Haplogroup in European populations.” Because of this fact every Participant with this Haplogroup should test ALL markers, so we have the maximum amount of genetic information for determining close relationships. Current test results show a number of Participants in this Group may not be genetically related within the genealogical time frame of documented surnames. However, there are a few Participants (#53790, #59523, #101252, and #122067) in the Group who are genetically related to each of the unrelated Participants. Perhaps this conundrum will be resolved when more DNA results are available from current Participants or additional documented research is provided. I will keep the current assignment of Participants to this Group until more DNA data is available. According to Family Tree DNA a Genetic Distance of 6 or higher should be interpreted as "Not Related"...their statement..."...the odds greatly favor that you have not shared a common male ancestor with this person within thousands of years."

#53790 tested only 12 markers and has a 12/12 match with #231, #59523, #101252, #122067, #138610, #153375, #159058, #182105, and #184042; a CAP of 91.41% within 24 generations. He has an 11/12 match with #196189 a CAP of 75.09% within 28 generations.  He has an 11/12 match with #170405 a CAP of 68.87% within 24 generations. He has an 11/12 match with #42124; a CAP of 67.37% within 24 generations. He also has an 11/12 match with #34209 a CAP of 66.71% within 24 generations The probabilities are different for these 11/12 matches because they occur on different markers with different mutation rates. While #53790 is currently assigned to this Common Ancestor Group he should test ALL markers to confirm a relationship to the Group Participants.

The Lineage provided by #232 and CA Group 2 Participants #53790, #59523, #159058, #184042, #211169 and #211224 shows the Common Ancestor Samuel Stout (1740-1816).  #232 descends from Joseph (1773-1839), son of Samuel; #53790 descends from Peter (1763-1831), son of Samuel; #59523 descends from Jacob (1782-1870), son of Samuel; and #159058, #184042, #211169 and #211224 descend from Samuel (1771-1839), son of Samuel.  Primary source documentation was not provided by most Participants, however, if secondary sources are accurate the DNA test results indicate that Joseph has C3 lineage, while the other three brothers have R1b1a2 lineage.  #232 descends from Hosea (1810-1889), son of Joseph.  To confirm the C3 lineage of Joseph, it is important to test males descending from Allen Joseph Stout, brother of Hosea.

#159058 and #211224 have an exact 67/67 match.  The nearest Common Ancestor for these two Participants is Ridley Stout (1896-1966).  We therefore have the Ancestral Result for Ridley.  In addition we can also state that the Ridley line shows one distinctive lineage marker which is different from the Group 2 Modal Value.  The Ridley line is currently identified with DYS438d=13 while the Group 2 Modal Value is 12 for this marker.

#184042 has a 66/67 match with #159058 and #211224.  These three Participants share the Common Ancestor Thomas Fletcher Bates Stout (1856-1929).  There also appears to be a distinctive lineage marker DYS464d=16 for these three descendants.  Because this marker is different from the Group 2 Modal Value of 18 this marker is an apparent branch marker for Thomas Fletcher Bates Stout.

#211169 has a 66/67 match with #184042 and a 65/67 match with #159058 and #211224.  These four Participants share the Common Ancestor Samuel Stout (1771-1839).  This group of four also share the Common Ancestor Samuel Stout (1740-1816) with Participants #53790 and #59523.  #53790 descends from Peter (1763-1831), son of Samuel; #59523 descends from Jacob (1782-1870), son of Samuel; and #159058, #184042, #211169 and #211224 descend from Samuel (1771-1839), son of Samuel.  These are the only Participants in the Project, with the same Haplotype, who claim a Common Ancestor within seven generations.  Participants #53790 and #59523 are encouraged to test ALL markers so we can resolve the Ancestral Result for Samuel (1740-1816) and help clarify the genetic branching within the lineage of the Oldest Ancestor “Richard.”

#251050 is the Projects' first Participant from England and finally provides an English Y-DNA lineage with significant matches to Richard (1615-1705), one of the American Immigrant Ancestors.  This Participant tested 67 markers and has the Haplogroup R1b1a2.  He has a 66/67 match with #101252; a CAP of 100% within 22 generations.  He has a 65/67 match with #211169; a CAP of 99.99% within 25 generations.  He has a 65/67 match (Genetic Distance 3) with #184042; a CAP of 99.98% within 28 generations. He has a 64/67 match with #182105 and #220588; a CAP of 99.98% within 28 generations.  He has a 63/67 match with #138610; a CAP of 99.92% within 28 generations.

#231 has a 34/37 match with #59523 and #184042; a CAP of 98.74% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #170405; a CAP of 97.33% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #159058; a CAP of 96.45% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #182105; a CAP of 96.28% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #153375; a CAP of 95.27% within 24 generations. He also has a 33/37 match with #122067; a CAP of 94.59% within 24 generations. The probabilities are different for these 33/37 matches because they occur on different markers with different mutation rates. Genetic Distance results for #231 indicate he is most likely NOT genetically related to #34209, #42124, #138610 and #196189.

#101252 tested 67 markers and has a 65/67 match with #182105; a CAP of 99.98% within 24 generations. He also has a 65/67 match with #184042; a CAP of 99.98% within 24 generations. He has a 64/67 match with #138610; a CAP of 99.91% within 24 generations. He also has a 64/67 match with #159058; a CAP of 99.9% within 24 generations. The probabilities for these 65/67 and 64/67 matches are different because they occur on different markers with different mutation rates. He has a 37/37 match with #122067; a CAP of 100% within 24 generations. He has a 36/37 match with #196189; a CAP of 100% within 28 generations.  He has a 36/37 match with #59523 and #153375; a CAP of 99.96% within 24 generations. He has a 34/37 match with #42124; a CAP of 98.74% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #170405; a CAP of 95.76% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #34209; a CAP of 95.27% within 24 generations. He also has a 33/37 match with #231; a CAP of 94.59% within 24 generations. The probabilities for these 33/37 matches are different because they occur on different markers with different mutation rates.

#59523 has a 36/37 match with #182105; a CAP of 99.99% within 24 generations. He has a 36/37 match with #184042; a CAP of 99.99% within 24 generations. He also has a 36/37 match with #122067; a CAP of 99.96% within 24 generations. He has a 35/37 match with #159058; a CAP of 99.86% within 24 generations.  He also has a 35/37 match with #196189; a CAP of 99.94% within 28 generations.  He has a 34/37 match with #170405; a CAP of 99.05% within 24 generations. He also has a 34/37 match with #34209; a CAP of 98.92% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #138610; a CAP of 96.05% within 24 generations. He also has a 33/37 match with #42124; a CAP of 94.62% within 24 generations.

#34209 has a 33/37 match with #184042; a CAP of 96.54% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #182105; a CAP of 96.28% within 24 generations. He also has a 33/37 match with #122067 and #153375; a CAP of 95.27% within 24 generations. The probabilities for these 33/37 matches are different because they occur on different markers with different mutation rates. #34209 has a 32/37 match with #159058; a CAP of 92.14% within 24 generations. He also has a 32/37 match with #42124; a CAP of 89.99% within 24 generations. According to Family Tree…”If enough time has passed it is possible these group members are distantly related family members. However that would nearly require that each line had passed a separate mutation and one would have experienced 2! The only way to confirm or deny is to test additional family lines and find where the mutation took place. Expressed another way, assume your score puts you at 3 on the clock. Assume the person from you is at the 9 position. Only by further testing can you find the person in between each of you...this in 'betweener' becomes essential for you to find, and in their absence the possibility of a match exists, but further evidence should be pursued.” Genetic Distance results for #34209 indicate he is most likely NOT genetically related to #231, #138610, #170405 and #196189.

#42124 has a 35/37 match with #196189; a CAP of 99.92% within 28 generations.  He has a 34/37 match with #122067; a CAP of 98.74% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match (Genetic Distance 5) with #153375; a CAP of 94.62% within 24 generations. He has a 32/37 match with #182105; a CAP of 87.97% within 24 generations. He also has a 32/37 match with #184042; a CAP of 87.33% within 24 generations. The explanation for the 'betweener' also applies to these 32/37 and 33/37 matches. Genetic Distance results for #42124 indicate he is most likely NOT genetically related to #231, #138610, #159058 and #170405.

#122067 has a 36/37 match with #196189; a CAP of 100% within 28 generations.  He has a 35/37 match with #182105; a CAP of 99.78% within 24 generations. He also has a 35/37 match with #184042; a CAP of 99.76% within 24 generations. He has a 34/37 match with #138610; a CAP of 99.12% within 24 generations. He also has a 34/37 match with #159058; a CAP of 99.08% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #170405; a CAP of 95.76% within 24 generations. Even though #122067 shows a probable relationship to #138610, #159058, and #170405, the Genetic Distance between these three Participants indicates that they are most likely NOT genetically related to each other.

#153375 has a 35/37 match with #122067; a CAP of 99.96% within 24 generations. He has a 35/37 match with #182105; a CAP of 99.78% within 24 generations. He has a 35/37 match (Genetic Distance 3) with #196189; a CAP of 99.94% within 28 generations.  He also has a 35/37 match with #184042; a CAP of 99.76% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #159058; a CAP of 99.08% within 24 generations. He has a 33/37 match with #138610; a CAP of 96.05% within 24 generations. He also has a 33/37 match with #170405; a CAP of 95.76% within 24 generations. Even though #153375 shows a probable relationship to #138610, #159058 and #170405 the Genetic Distance between each of these three Participants indicates that they are most likely NOT genetically related to each other.

#182105 has a 66/67 match with #211169; a CAP of 100% within 22 generations.  #182105 has a 65/67 match with #184042; a CAP of 99.99% within 24 generations.  He has a 64/67 match with #211224; a CAP of 99.99% within 28 generations.  He has a 63/67 match with #159058; a CAP of 99.94% within 24 generations.  He has a 62/67 match with #138610; a CAP of 98.41% within 24 generations.

#184042 has a 66/67 match with #159058; a CAP of 100% within 24 generations. He has a 62/67 match with #138610; a CAP of 98.31% within 24 generations.

#196189 has a 33/37 match with #138610; a CAP of 99.04% within 28 generations.  He also has a 33/37 match with #159058; a CAP of 98.99% within 28 generations.  Genetic Distance results for #196189 indicate he is most likely NOT genetically related to #231, #34209 and #170405.

Participants #42124, #53790, #59523, #159058, #184042, #211169 and #211224 claim the same Oldest Ancestor as #232 from CA Group 1.  However, DNA test results confirmed there is NO “genetic” relationship between these two CA Groups.  However, there may still be a “family” relationship based on undocumented circumstances.  This relationship might be explained by a "non-paternal" event, which could be an unreported adoption, in at least one of the “Richard” lines of descent.  The Haplogroup C3 indicates this “adoptee” may have Native American lineage.

The diagram CAG 2 on the Photos page is representative of current information and is subject to revision as new Participants are tested.  Ancestors are listed with birth years unless otherwise noted. The markers at the end node are the mutations which vary from the Group2 modal values and may be "branch" markers for the designated lineage.  The red markers are "fast" mutating markers. Ancestors in "red" have been listed by two of more Participants from different Haplogroups and DNA results suggest conflicting information with the genealogical research. Participants in "blue" are most likely NOT related based on the Genetic Distance mismatch.  The Participants in "green" are perfect 67/67 matches; #159058 matches #211224, and #211169 matches #B25343.

Unassigned Group